Samsung hm251jj firmware update

This means that Android 10 would be the last update for the S9 and S9 Plus, given that they launched with Android Oreo. As for the Galaxy S10 series , you can expect Android 12 to be its last update. The Galaxy S21 phones launched with Android 11 , so they should get updates till Android Also read: The best Android phones you can buy. Below is a complete list. More: The best budget phones. That image then can be used to restore your system later to the same drive or to a new drive.

A new replacement drive must be at least as large gb as the old one. The image made is a folder of compressed files which is considerably smaller than the original drive. Only the sectors used are saved. I have used it to back up my computers periodically, and doing that part is fairly easy. Never have needed to do the restore part though.

I have made a bootable CD with it and here is what I want to do: I have a Windows XP machine with enough space on its hard drive to hold the image of my laptop hard drive, which is the one that needs to be replaced. I have both of these machines connected to a router. I made a shared folder on my XP machine. I would like to use clonezilla to make the image of the laptop hard drive, and save it to the folder on my XP machine.

Then I'll replace the hard drive, boot with clonezilla again and copy the image back from the XP machine to the new hard drive. However, I am having trouble setting up clonezilla to find that folder on my XP machine. Does anyone have any ideas on how to do this? Or do you have an alternative method I should try? All comments are appreciated. In the words of Nelly the elephant - "Hold up" I have just received a brand new netbook - a Dell Mini I load up Karmic on a flash drive and receive this very same notification about bad sectors on my drive.

Especially as a friend of mine has just taken delivery of a Mini 12 and had the very same message. I very much doubt the drive is failing but yes, that is a strange and coincidental possibility. I think the data you're looking for is in post 19 of this thread.

If you need something else, let me know. I still haven't been able to figure out Clonezilla yet, so my new hard drive is still in the box. Ah, should have searched more in Launchpad. T data, but the chances are that your hardware is fine and the value is being misreported. I'll be taking this new hard drive back to Best Buy now. Well that's a relief. The last thing you want to do is lose some data! Will be posting more data on launchpad soon.

I have currently pending sectors, which is over the threshold of - presumably set by palimpset itself. However, is really nothing to worry about. I got this too after upgrading to 9. I'm running a Maxtor 40GB 4DH2, and never had any problems before, and to be totally clean, I even zero-filled the drive with the Maxtor disk before installing 9.

Not sure what other info I can provide. Same thing happened to me Add me to the list. My old, but, under used ATA Fujitsu is throwing up the same error message on my laptop.

Three months ago was running absolutely clean under Windows. No apparent problem while running 8. Think I'll stick with it for now, but, stay well backed up! But all of this disks are all new. I did an upgrade with one of the beta releases of 9.

I did a clean install, but just this morning I have a report that this hard drive is now failing! It's brand new! What I have noticed is with several hdd's in my PC it's always the one where Ubuntu is installed Aaand exactly the same here. Samsung ATA disk which apparently is full or errors, out of the blue, after upgrading from 9. I hope this really is a bug and gets fixed soon, cos it's annoying. Well, I'm pretty sure it's a bug cos we're all getting the same messages and most of us are pretty sure our HDs are fine, right?

I'm running other scans and stuff just in case and so far so good. Install your os on a new drive and copy the files back onto the new drive. If you would like to try to save the old drive first run d-ban on it if there are any errors on it you will get an error message stating d-ban finished early possibly due to bad sectors.

I'm having the same problem with a dual boot. I had this problem with the alphas but not since the beta came out. It's scary at first to see those dire warnings. I think if you use the manufacturer's utilities and they say everything's okay then not to worry. Of course it's always a good idea to stay backed up anyway. Similar issue here. I think I will look for another utility to test this against just to rule out the possibility of the hard disk actually failing.

Same thing happened to me as well : I am surprised that they released the final 9. Glad to find this thread; I upgraded my desktop to 9. Testing under Windows showed it to be ok and I found the launchpad bug, but it's nice to hear from others having the same scare. I'm trusting that it's good, but redundant backups are a great thing.

I have the exact same Hard drive as you. I'm getting the same warning after a fresh 9. You definitely have a failing disk you have a value of 57 bad sectors, and the threshold is 63, that means 6 more bad sectors and the drive is toast, it may run for years yet, or it could die tomorrow.

I would suggest backing up your data asap and start looking for a new drive. Normalized Worst Threshold 5 Value Same problem here. Normalized: Worst: Threshold: 24 Value: sectors My value is somewhat higher, so I am wondering if I have indeed a failing harddrive, of that it is a bug like suggested above.

My harddrive is about 4 to 5 years old, so I could imagine that some hardware is indeed failing No critical data though, just experimenting with Ubuntu a bit.

Can someone tell me how I can check my harddrive with another tool than the standard Disk Utility? I am a Linux noob, so please keep it simple ; Thanks in advance, Mark. Just upgraded to 9. What tests are recommended to determine if this is real or not?

Please be explicit. OK I will take a crack at this The disk utility seems to be causing some panic and may or may not be incorrect depending on your specific hard drive. Unless you really want to configure mail properly I would choose none or local. I have the smart tools email me notifications, but that is not something most people will need.

Since this is the particular attribute that is causing a stir I wanted to narrow the focus. The threshold will vary depending on the type of disk and manufacturer. Generally 36 seems to be a common number for desktop hardrives.

For 2. An unscientific survey of the dirves in my laptops showed thresholds between 24 and Additionally you should run the manufacturers disk utilities see below.

This will speed up the RMA process if it is still under warranty. Again this is personal experience, not concrete fact, but I have noticed a tendency for Seagate and Samsung Drives to report a few bad sectors on a regular basis. Western Digital however rarely reports bad sectors until the drive is starting to have problems. This may be just the luck of the draw for me or it may be a variation in the way the different manufacturers report SMART data. Most will require you to boot into windows but some will have a bootable CD.

In reality for the most part these disk utilities will basically be reading the SMART data, but since it is a program from the manufacturer I would argue that they are better equipped to determine the appropriate values for the data. Out of 5 1.

Out of 12 other drives from various manufacturers and size only 2 are currently reporting bad sectors 14 and 9. But it has the unfortunate side effect of causing panic when the user is not used to seeing errors on their hard drives. EDIT: I wanted to add a small editorial on Windows "check disk" chkdsk and other non manufacturer Windows disk utilities are pretty much worthless for determining the health of the hardware. What the Micorsoft tools check is whether the file system is intact, not whether the hardware on which the file system resides is intact.

In most cases by the time chkdsk would detect a problem caused by hardware failure it is too late. It is not fool proof, not even close check the paper written by Google on the subject , but it does help. Here is my report: Keep in mind the drive only has Ubuntu installed. I have two other disk drives, one for win and the other for my data. If this drive dies, I lose nothing, except a separate disk for Ubuntu, and the MBR, which is easy to fix.

Anyways, have a look and tell me if disaster as close as Palimpsest and smartmontools says it is. I just upgraded my HP Laptop to 9. Same problem here, with a Compaq Presario R Everything's backed up just in case, but I'm going to ignore this warning. Infact upgraded on two different mahcines which are way older without any errors.

Strange that most of them who reported this problem are using Samgsung HD. The Galaxy Watch models are getting better fall detection, new watchfaces, and updated group challenges. When Samsung dropped the bombshell that it was ditching Tizen for Wear OS 3, it promised not to leave older Galaxy Watch models in the dust.

Triggering the feature will automatically send an SOS message to pre-selected contacts. Another small health feature update is Group Challenges, which lets you keep track of the competition from your wrist. All four smartwatches will also get 10 new watch faces that launched this past summer with the Galaxy Watch 4.

Subscribe to get the best Verge-approved tech deals of the week. Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from.

By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies. Cybersecurity Mobile Policy Privacy Scooters. Phones Laptops Headphones Cameras.